13.7% Percentage of designers using dedicated recruiting tools - the lowest adoption of any research category
Read manifesto
USER RESEARCH / RESEARCH RECRUITING
USER RESEARCH / RESEARCH RECRUITING
USER RESEARCH / RESEARCH RECRUITING
Top 10 Research Recruiting Tools
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
UserTesting
Maze
User Interviews
SurveyMonkey
Respondent
TestingTime
Optimal Workshop
PlaybookUX
Userlytics
Ethnio
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Top 10 Research Recruiting Tools
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
UserTesting
Maze
User Interviews
SurveyMonkey
Respondent
TestingTime
Optimal Workshop
PlaybookUX
Userlytics
Ethnio
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Top 10 Research Recruiting Tools
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
UserTesting
Maze
User Interviews
SurveyMonkey
Respondent
TestingTime
Optimal Workshop
PlaybookUX
Userlytics
Ethnio
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
13.7% Percentage of designers using dedicated recruiting tools - the lowest adoption of any research category
13.7% Percentage of designers using dedicated recruiting tools - the lowest adoption of any research category
1.02
Satisfaction gap between highest-rated specialized tool (Optimal Workshop, 4.67) and most popular (UserTesting, 3.65)
1.02
Satisfaction gap between highest-rated specialized tool (Optimal Workshop, 4.67) and most popular (UserTesting, 3.65)
1.02
Satisfaction gap between highest-rated specialized tool (Optimal Workshop, 4.67) and most popular (UserTesting, 3.65)
The Participant Recruitment Challenge
The Participant Recruitment Challenge
The Participant Recruitment Challenge
Research participant recruitment faces three key challenges:
Limited specialized tool adoption (only 13.7% of designers)
Limited specialized tool adoption (only 13.7% of designers)
Limited specialized tool adoption (only 13.7% of designers)
Panel quality concerns (47.2% cite "finding qualified participants")
Panel quality concerns (47.2% cite "finding qualified participants")
Panel quality concerns (47.2% cite "finding qualified participants")
Cost-quality tradeoffs (higher rated tools see lower adoption)
Cost-quality tradeoffs (higher rated tools see lower adoption)
Cost-quality tradeoffs (higher rated tools see lower adoption)
Research Tool Integration Effectiveness
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
Fully integrated
Partial integration
Separate specialized tools
No formal recruitment tool
Adoption rate
Avg. Satisfaction
Research Tool Integration Effectiveness
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
Fully integrated
Partial integration
Separate specialized tools
No formal recruitment tool
Adoption rate
Avg. Satisfaction
Research Tool Integration Effectiveness
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
Fully integrated
Partial integration
Separate specialized tools
No formal recruitment tool
Adoption rate
Avg. Satisfaction