21.4% Percentage of Corporate ICs using Miro despite FigJam's dominance - indicating persistent need for specialized collaboration features
Read manifesto
DIGITAL WHITEBOARDING / SHAPES OF WORK
DIGITAL WHITEBOARDING / SHAPES OF WORK
DIGITAL WHITEBOARDING / SHAPES OF WORK
Corporate Designers
Corporate Designers
Corporate Designers
Corporate ICs
54.6%
Figjam
4.40/5
21.4%
Miro
4.25/5
2.0%
Mural
3.80/5
Corporate ICs
54.6%
Figjam
4.40/5
21.4%
Miro
4.25/5
2.0%
Mural
3.80/5
Corporate ICs
54.6%
Figjam
4.40/5
21.4%
Miro
4.25/5
2.0%
Mural
3.80/5
Corporate Leaders
46.4%
Figjam
4.35/5
27.9%
Miro
4.20/5
3.0%
Mural
3.75/5
Corporate Leaders
46.4%
Figjam
4.35/5
27.9%
Miro
4.20/5
3.0%
Mural
3.75/5
Corporate Leaders
46.4%
Figjam
4.35/5
27.9%
Miro
4.20/5
3.0%
Mural
3.75/5
21.4% Percentage of Corporate ICs using Miro despite FigJam's dominance - indicating persistent need for specialized collaboration features
21.4% Percentage of Corporate ICs using Miro despite FigJam's dominance - indicating persistent need for specialized collaboration features
Growth Company Designers
Growth Company Designers
Growth Company Designers
Growth ICs
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Growth ICs
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Growth ICs
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Growth Leaders
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Growth Leaders
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Growth Leaders
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Growth Designers show stronger FigJam preference than Corporate environments, likely due to fewer legacy tool constraints and more greenfield implementation opportunities.
Growth Designers show stronger FigJam preference than Corporate environments, likely due to fewer legacy tool constraints and more greenfield implementation opportunities.
Growth Designers show stronger FigJam preference than Corporate environments, likely due to fewer legacy tool constraints and more greenfield implementation opportunities.
Startup Designers
Startup Designers
Startup Designers
Startup ICs
56.5%
Figjam
4.45/5
13.7%
Miro
4.15/5
2.2%
Whimsical
4.35/5
Startup ICs
56.5%
Figjam
4.45/5
13.7%
Miro
4.15/5
2.2%
Whimsical
4.35/5
Startup ICs
56.5%
Figjam
4.45/5
13.7%
Miro
4.15/5
2.2%
Whimsical
4.35/5
Startup Leaders
54.2%
Figjam
4.45/5
13.5%
Miro
4.10/5
2.6%
Whimsical
4.40/5
Startup Leaders
54.2%
Figjam
4.45/5
13.5%
Miro
4.10/5
2.6%
Whimsical
4.40/5
Startup Leaders
54.2%
Figjam
4.45/5
13.5%
Miro
4.10/5
2.6%
Whimsical
4.40/5
13.6% Average Miro adoption rate among Startup Designers - the lowest of any professional work shape
13.6% Average Miro adoption rate among Startup Designers - the lowest of any professional work shape
13.6% Average Miro adoption rate among Startup Designers - the lowest of any professional work shape
Agency Designers
Agency Designers
Agency Designers
Agency ICs
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Whimsical
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Agency ICs
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Whimsical
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Agency ICs
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Whimsical
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Agency Leaders
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Agency Leaders
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Agency Leaders
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Agency Design Leaders show higher Miro adoption than ICs, reflecting client compatibility needs where Miro's longer market presence provides an advantage.
Agency Design Leaders show higher Miro adoption than ICs, reflecting client compatibility needs where Miro's longer market presence provides an advantage.
Agency Design Leaders show higher Miro adoption than ICs, reflecting client compatibility needs where Miro's longer market presence provides an advantage.
Independent/Solo Designers
Independent/Solo Designers
Independent/Solo Designers
Solo In-House
46.7%
Figjam
4.32/5
16.8%
Miro
4.15/5
1.6%
Whimsical
4.30/5
Solo In-House
46.7%
Figjam
4.32/5
16.8%
Miro
4.15/5
1.6%
Whimsical
4.30/5
Solo In-House
46.7%
Figjam
4.32/5
16.8%
Miro
4.15/5
1.6%
Whimsical
4.30/5
Independent
38.1%
Figjam
4.30/5
24.5%
Miro
4.22/5
1.9%
Whimsical
4.30/5
Independent
38.1%
Figjam
4.30/5
24.5%
Miro
4.22/5
1.9%
Whimsical
4.30/5
Independent
38.1%
Figjam
4.30/5
24.5%
Miro
4.22/5
1.9%
Whimsical
4.30/5
37.4% Percentage of Independent Designers using tools other than FigJam or Miro - the highest diversity in whiteboarding tool usage
37.4% Percentage of Independent Designers using tools other than FigJam or Miro - the highest diversity in whiteboarding tool usage
37.4% Percentage of Independent Designers using tools other than FigJam or Miro - the highest diversity in whiteboarding tool usage
Design Educators/Students
Design Educators/Students
Design Educators/Students
Design EDucators
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
Miro
FigJam
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Design EDucators
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
Miro
FigJam
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Design EDucators
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
Miro
FigJam
Mural
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Design Students
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Whimsical
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Design Students
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Whimsical
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Design Students
100%
5
75%
4
50%
2
25%
1
0%
0
FigJam
Miro
Whimsical
% of respondents
Rating 0-5
Educators are the only work shape where Miro (38.6%) outperforms FigJam (31.8%), highlighting the gap between academic practices and industry preparation.
Educators are the only work shape where Miro (38.6%) outperforms FigJam (31.8%), highlighting the gap between academic practices and industry preparation.
Educators are the only work shape where Miro (38.6%) outperforms FigJam (31.8%), highlighting the gap between academic practices and industry preparation.