Read manifesto

DESIGN SYSTEMS / TRENDS

DESIGN SYSTEMS / TRENDS

DESIGN SYSTEMS / TRENDS

Figma Design Systems Adoption by Work Shape

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

Agency ICs

Growth ICs

Solo In-House

Corporate ICs

Corporate Leaders

Growth Leaders

Agency Leaders

Independent

Startup ICs

Startup Leaders

Educators

Students

Overall Aevrage

Figma Design Systems Adoption by Work Shape

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

Agency ICs

Growth ICs

Solo In-House

Corporate ICs

Corporate Leaders

Growth Leaders

Agency Leaders

Independent

Startup ICs

Startup Leaders

Educators

Students

Overall Aevrage

Figma Design Systems Adoption by Work Shape

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

Agency ICs

Growth ICs

Solo In-House

Corporate ICs

Corporate Leaders

Growth Leaders

Agency Leaders

Independent

Startup ICs

Startup Leaders

Educators

Students

Overall Aevrage

From Standalone Tools to Integrated Workflows

From Standalone Tools to Integrated Workflows

From Standalone Tools to Integrated Workflows

The data shows design systems tools following the pattern established in UI design tools, with consolidation accelerating around ecosystem advantages.

Figma's dominance extends across multiple categories:

UI Design (82.3%)

UI Design (82.3%)

UI Design (82.3%)

Basic Prototyping (71.4%)

Basic Prototyping (71.4%)

Basic Prototyping (71.4%)

Design Systems (59.2%)

Design Systems (59.2%)

Design Systems (59.2%)

Summary: The Design System Divide

Three clear patterns are emerging:

1

The Ecosystem Lock-in

Figma's 59.2% market share reflects its powerful ecosystem advantage, with design systems reinforcing platform loyalty

2

The Development Divide

Specialized tools like Storybook (2.4%) and Zeroheight (1.6%) persist despite low market share because they address critical development handoff needs

3

The Scale Spectrum

Design system approaches vary dramatically by organization size, from enterprise governance challenges to startup MVP approaches

Summary: The Design System Divide

Three clear patterns are emerging:

1

The Ecosystem Lock-in

Figma's 59.2% market share reflects its powerful ecosystem advantage, with design systems reinforcing platform loyalty

2

The Development Divide

Specialized tools like Storybook (2.4%) and Zeroheight (1.6%) persist despite low market share because they address critical development handoff needs

3

The Scale Spectrum

Design system approaches vary dramatically by organization size, from enterprise governance challenges to startup MVP approaches

Summary: The Design System Divide

Three clear patterns are emerging:

1

The Ecosystem Lock-in

Figma's 59.2% market share reflects its powerful ecosystem advantage, with design systems reinforcing platform loyalty

2

The Development Divide

Specialized tools like Storybook (2.4%) and Zeroheight (1.6%) persist despite low market share because they address critical development handoff needs

3

The Scale Spectrum

Design system approaches vary dramatically by organization size, from enterprise governance challenges to startup MVP approaches

By 2026, hybrid design-development tools will disrupt the traditional handoff.

Supporting data: The 46.3% of respondents reporting "significant inconsistencies" between design systems and implementation, combined with the 37% higher satisfaction for integrated approaches, signals a market opportunity for tools that bridge the design-development gap.

By 2026, hybrid design-development tools will disrupt the traditional handoff.

Supporting data: The 46.3% of respondents reporting "significant inconsistencies" between design systems and implementation, combined with the 37% higher satisfaction for integrated approaches, signals a market opportunity for tools that bridge the design-development gap.

By 2026, hybrid design-development tools will disrupt the traditional handoff.

Supporting data: The 46.3% of respondents reporting "significant inconsistencies" between design systems and implementation, combined with the 37% higher satisfaction for integrated approaches, signals a market opportunity for tools that bridge the design-development gap.